Jamaal Tinsley?

Here's a link to an article in today's NY Post. It says Walsh might have known the Pacers were going to cut ties with Tinsley which is why he's been dragging his feet in signing Sessions to an offer sheet.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/07232009/sports/knicks/pacers__guard_cut_ties_180787.htm

Hm an average 30 yrs old injury prone player who spent a year out of the NBA due to contract issues with his team?

SIGN US UP!

I don't think so. Tinsley wasn't allowed to play for most of last season and Walsh may have had a hand in that. If that's the case, Tinsley wouldn't want anything to do with Walsh.

I agree that I hope the Knicks don't seriously look at Tinsley. Personally, with all the hype about Sessions, I think I'd rather see them sign him -- young with upside. My concern (and I can't remember seeing him play) is that he was a low 2nd round pick 2 years ago who didn't play a ton last year. Is he that good or is this just hype?

Sessions is a good young pg with upside. His court vision is very good and he can score if needed. The only thing he needs to really work on is his outside shooting. He doesn't take a ton of 3s but should work on it since he will need that to get to the next level.

so...

why don't you call this thread

"Donnie has just contracted retardation!"

This would only work if we somehow got Steve Jax, and Ron Artest!

Sad thing is a the late 90's early 2000's pacers lineup (even at their age today) is better than any lineup we could put out right now.

Donnie Walsh gave Tinsley that extension couple years back and that was one of the reasons he(walsh) is not there now. Donnie won't make that mistake twice.

Tinsley is 31 years old and injury prone. Hell no.

Marbury light. Fuggedaboutit :afro: