LJ4ptplay
Starter
I get that it's your opinion and everyone is entitled to one, but when we start debating opinions and not really stating why we have that opinion then it's not really a conversation anymore and just people saying words. I know you don't think both players complement each other, but I don't know why. I see Amar'e who's a free-throw line down player, and Melo who's a free-throw line extended player. They can coexist in an offense that puts them in their spots to operate (like the last play in Memphis when Melo is in the high post and STAT comes over and slips the screen and posts his man up near the baseline.) But the offense as it's currently constructed really doesn't utilize both of their talents as effectively as a more traditional offense would. That's why there was word of D'Antoni slowing down the offense with the acquisition of Melo and Billups...but coincidently the only time either player looked like their old selves was their debut against the Bucks when they weren't really running MDA's offense.
It's not like a LBJ and Wade situation where both guys are ball dominant and are primarily penetrators and finishers. STAT uses his athleticism in the paint to get shots up and get to the line, while Melo is an inside-out type of player who can do a bit of it all. Both don't need the ball...one can be ball dominant and the other plays a position where the ball is fed to him...Pau, Dirk, LA, Duncan, etc aren't the players they are because they bring the ball up the court and then go to work....they get to their spots and are fed the ball to do what they do. So there's no reason why Melo and STAT can't play off of each other, we already saw Melo and Martin (when he was relatively healthy) and Melo and Nene the past season and a half. Neither guy is exactly a STAT, but both are paint players while Melo was....Melo.
You can have the opinion that they don't complement each other, and have that be the reason why you don't think the Knicks should have got Melo...but it's not like we haven't seen Melo with bigs who got theirs and put up solid numbers. He got his numbers and so did they...there's enough shots to go around in the right offense.
Oh, and if Donnie feels it more prudent to trade up in this draft and try to get a PG who can learn under Billups next season, and when Billups' $17M comes off the books after next season, we can go shopping then. You're hooked up on the second max we got, but the 3rd max would be the crippling one. $17M might be a worth a little more in terms of talent under the new CBA. If salaries are going down, then you might be able to get a LITTLE more out of $17 million dollars. Plus there's the MLE this offseason (if the MLE survives,) either way...the Knicks still have flexibility going forward. Melo did nothing to disrupt that. We can still end up with "superstar and superstar, plus the supporting cast" which is our best bet. No one is emulating what the Lakers are doing, because no one is going to trade pennies for gold bars.
Melo was never hitting free agency, we had to go get him, and we didn't trade anything that's irreplaceable via the draft and with Billups' expiring. Once we get a coach in here who knows how to maneuver his chess pieces, we'll be straight.
I disagree. Both Amare and Melo are ball dominant. Hence the Knicks averaging a league low in assists since Melo's arrival. Both players are free throw line in players. Melo is a poor outside shooter and he uses his quickness to get to the line, just like Amare. Both receive the ball at the same spot on the court (around the free throw line or elbow). Both are very lazy defenders and only provide scoring. My opinion is based on more than just words.
The future flexibility you speak of is the real factor here. I personally don't see it but if Donnie is able to build a bench, find a starting Center, a replacement for Billups, and a solid supporting cast that is able to compensate for Melo and Amare's deficiencies (e.g. defense, outside shooting, rebounding, playmaking, etc), then we are in good shape. But I do not have the same optimism as you. We have zero cap space this summer. ZERO. Unless we don't keep Billups, which is a bad choice because Douglas is not good enough to be the permanent starting PG. Even if there is a MLE, I don't see us using it, because it seems like we are trying to preserve cap space for 2012. So the same team we see now is likely to be the same team we have next year, puls/minus a few minor changes. Still not contenders.
I don't see how a team with almost 70% of their cap invested in two players, no assets to speak of, and a more restrictive CBA coming in the future can afford us the flexibility to build around Amare and Melo. To me, there seems to be too many holes and not enough flexiblity to fill them.
Like I said, we didn't have to gut the team for Melo. We could have called his bluff. If he had gone to the Nets, big deal. We still would have been able to build a much better team than the one we will be left with. Melo was not the be-all and end-all for the Knicks. There were much better options than gutting the team for Melo. This wasn't necessary.
But I guess we will find out this summer if it was worth it. If a more restricitve CBA comes out of the negotiations, as predicted by almost everybody, we may be screwed. If we still have the flexibility to build a solid roster, then it was worth it. We'll see.