i don't know, what's the answer? that's not much of an opinion, K-man.
Do u really want to know???
Having a 20-31 record with no chemistry, no effort, and a headcoach playing musical-chairs with the starting-5 lineup, using injuries and restriction as an excuse for the many losses, having a healthy roster to start the season with a 3-13 start.
Its difficult or impossible to decide what players are best to be our starting-5 lineup, or what 5 players are best to be in our closer lineup.
Our starting center Tyson missed 24 games.
Our starting PF Barg missed 9 games.
Our starting SF Melo missed 3 games.
Our starting SG Shump missed 2 games.
Our starting PG Felton missed 16 games.
Our 6th man JRsmith missed 7 games.
Our backup PG Prigioni missed 16 games.
Our rookie SG Tim Hardaway Jr. (aka THJ) missed 1 game, plus started 1 game (over vets Shump/JR/MWP).
"our HC should've been question for starting THJ over veterans."
Since the first game of the season rookie THJ were given crunchtime closer minutes in the 4th qtr. over all our veteran players on a consistent basis.
"our HC should've been question for playing THJ over veteran-players in the final 6 minute of the game consistently."
We Have 9 veteran players, plus 3rd season Shump, and 2nd season Prigioni, there's no way rookie THJ none experience should receive crunch time playingtime minutes consistently in the teams first 40 games of the season.
Or put in the starting lineup over veteran players.
When Barg/Amare/K-Mart/MWP were all injured throughout 2 weeks did we start rookie Jeremy Tyler? NO!
Have Jeremy Tyler receive playingtime during a crunchtime 4th qtr. game? NO!
Last season we never started JRsmith in any game, even when half of our guards were out with injuries.
By doing that last season we never resulted in having a starting-5 lineup, bc JRsmith came off the bench 3 minute after tip-off.
Plus JR started the 3rd quarter of 80 games...