my alias is a tribute to a higher entity... let me guess, yours means you ride the subway???
LOL, why are you taking alias so seriously. My BAD self proclaimed higher entity. :teeth: Do more research, i appreciate everyone's opinion, but you just flood threads with ongoing thoughts with not much sources or info. Thanks.
Lee brings it and deserves to start, but randolph is much better, and wouldn't make sense to not start randolph. I agree most of zeke's trades stink, this one however i think was pretty good. WHy are you such a randolph hater? He give us a good mid-short range shooter, who can post, rebound and is young. Lee at this stage, just rebounds and scores on breaks and cuts/slashes and tip ins. Don't get me wrong he's awesome and i really have nothing bad to say about lee, he may develope a solid shot this season, but zach brings another dimension to offense now. I bet, you'll even see lee and randolph together sometimes.
I'm excited to see the different combinations of guys on the floor. Plus, zachs gonna have to shoot, so maybe he'll steal shots and touches from jamaal!!!!(always a bonus)
First of all, understand I approve of the Randolph trade. We get rid of two bitch players for a good player.
If you think Lee just rebounds, re-watch all 58 games David Lee in 06-07, then you would come back with something more insight to say about David Lee than he just rebounds.
To our offense? Well, what is Zach and what is he good at? Zach is a 20 and 10 PF. Thats AWESOME, cool.
But Zach likes to go one on one, either for a fade away or a nice fundamental move in the paint. Thats excellent, cause we get another option on offense.
Heres the problem; we're not like Golden State or Phoneix(We should be) with Eddy Curry on offense, because we need to slow down the pace and set things up for Eddy. So us going at a decently slow to average offensive pace with a other guys who like to score one on one(Marbury, Robinson, Crawford, Q-Rich, Curry)...where will our ball movement be? Spurs don't have many guys who can create their own shot, but they have guys who make OPEN shots and CREATE open shots. This is what our offense LACKS, and I was pretty disappointed Isiah didn't address that Isiah. We averaged 97 points a game, which isn't even that good with our team having more offensive talent than defensive talent.
We have a great set of players, we just need those guys to fill in the gaps, and subtract the guys who make that gap wider. With Randolph now, I could easily see the gap become more wider now. I'm hoping that isn't the income, but its close to possible. Do you understand that?
Carpy, you have to be BLIND to say the Knicks have NO problems, just BLIND.
As for George M., if you could any bring up 2 games that Randolph have, I could bring up 20 was a factor to our victories or just being the biggest factor on our team. Lee is ranked ahead of Randolph as a KNICK to me, because Lee has done much more than Randolph, Randolph has played zero games, therefor I'm not satified by him yet. Lee is the man, dude made one of the most clutchest shots in our decade...that shit was mad UNDERRATED too, it was so unreal dudes couldn't feel the momment cause it happend so fast. Not only that, just his season alone. 10 and 10 off the bench, 60% FG, 80% FT.
All I'm gonna say sophmore Lee > sophmore Randolph. LOL, just to rub it in a FACT, I'm not saying its going to prove anything. Don't be so serious and tense about it too, I know how you take things.
btw, You would be the funniest drug dealer. I can't even imagine it cause it'll be so funny.
You'll be running up to customs infront of popo screaming "YO MAN!!!, I GOT THAT FLURRY FIRE!!!, HALF AN OUNCE FOR 40!!!, YOU WANT TO COP SOME!?!??!?!??!"
lol, don't even play yourself brother, just laugh about it.