Smart Guy? you the one still watchin cartoons son. The rest of the post didnt show up for some reason, If it did then everything he sed would had been quoted **** **** fag. Go watch some cartoons. I aint got time for your loony tunes.
now onto lilman......Isiahs advocate clearly made a comparison
"haha only problem is Curry reported to camp 20 lbs lighter. Didn't I just see you question someones loyalty to the team because they made a negative comment about Allan Houston?"
Big difference between Houston and Curry. Like metro said, they probably started watchin the knicks in 2003 or 2004. I like Curry even though hes a turnover waiting to happen and a poor defender, but to compare crticizing Houston to criticizing Curry is something an unloyal knick fan would do. In my opinion, isiahs advocate is not a knick fan.
For the record, although I like Curry I would trade him for a center that can play defense and rebound without hesitation, even if hes offensively challenged.
sorrrrrrrrry to offend anyone but allan houston is absolutely not a knick legend.
since when does averaging 17.5 ppg while playing absolutelly terrible defense and putting the franchise in the hole for almost a decade after signing him to the worst contract in nba history make someone a legend?
oh i get it. hes a legend, because he can be remembered for being a huge bust and a terrible decision by the knicks management to give this guy 100million
i dont know what hes doing on this years team except to bring in a little more publicity.
one possibility is that the knicks recognize their lack of outside shooting, but at what price? putting houston in will only create further holes on the knicks defense.
"Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand."
Anyways, fools assume and the wise take facts and build concrete arguments. You two clowns have yet to do that. Please don't defend that kid...that's like defending Chris Dudley by saying he can shoot free throws...it's a no win situation. Speak from your head. And let's get one thing straight...no one is mad that everyone "hates" Eddy Curry...it's the fact that no one has faith in him and you call yourselves knick fans?? Get real...if you pessimists rode the bandwagon here...take the next stop because my true knick fans aren't having it....
I have nothing more to add on the comparison that was made earlier. **** ***** dick **** fag. It doesn't bother you at all that Curry and Randolph do not know how to play defense? There's not much hope for either of them, they softer than John Ameachi. I like them on offense but both of them are slow and defensively challenged.
Yes you're right...it would bother me if Curry and Randolph did not know how to play defense. But isn't the case. They DON'T play defense. There is a difference...look it up. Isiah has been preaching defense since the beginning of training camp and I've seen impressive results during some of the preseason games so I like what I see. Unless you're a brickhead...I suggest you look at some preseason games too before dishing out disrespectful words to the players. Ignorance is not a virtue...so learn from this post...
Why did you assume and lie so much in your first paragraph?
Everything is **** to you, so no point on talking with a **** head.
I burried this Isiahsexual(one of the weaker ones), onto more important post.
GM_in_2020, if you don't remember's Houston's leadership and his professionalism as a Knick, then that makes me question how long you've followed this team. The division between the Knicks nation are the new-born Isiahsexuals who consider everything pre-Isiah terrible and bad, and everything after Isiah the greatest thing to happend to the franchise. The other half of the Knicks nation are the Knick fans. The fans who want success back in New York, and the best future possible for the Knicks. These fans appreciate defense(from experiences of watching the Knicks being a successful defensive team in the 90s), and these fans are aware of the blunders Isiah has made, how bad of a owner Dolan is, and at fact we've been suffering for almost a decade, and want a change now. This is what we must understand, and when we understand that, we know where we stand.
datruth, Curry is what he is. Accept it. In the 2006-07 Isiah just increased Curry's minutes, even if it meant worse defense and more turnovers for the team. Curry's per 40 minute stats weren't really that different. He's still the same player as he was in his last season in Chicago, except he's more of a ***** and won't try to play defense. Have you atleast watched over 60 Knicks game? From what I seen, Curry only played defense once, and that was he played Milwaukee at the end of the season.
Only difference in the 06-07 season Curry lowered his fouls per game by about two. But our team payed the price by not having a presence in the paint because Curry didn't want to guard or patrol the paint. Curry instead gave no effort or performance on defense and just concreted on offense, where he wasn't that good all around, except at scoring in the paint. This created a lot of holes for our team, because we focused our whole team on a one dimensional player like Curry, the results in 06-07 showed Curry cannot be the man.
Stop being sensitive about Curry's weight, thanks.
Curry does not equal = the Knicks.
lol @ datruth thinking cause Curry and Randolph were dominant in NBA Live it will work in real life.
Just what I thought you would do.. you are so lame... if you have time and money, i can show you how to debate son.