"you all have Mike D'Antoni's sperm in your mouths and Donnie Walsh's testicles in your tonsils."
I'm impressed. You are The Man.
LGAY TAKES ANOTHER LOSS.
I said find a post where I said they should be traded, stupid.
That post says "trade ideas."
Nice try, LGAY, but you lose once again.
Get off my nuts, and stop sucking D'Antoni and Walsh's dick.
The fact that you had to dig over a year to find one post that you had to manipulate and distort shows that you're a stalker and a lurker.
Please kindly hop off my dick.
For all of you reading this thread, LGAY is not only gay, but he's a manipulator. He failed to include the post I made IMMEDIATELY proceeding that other post. This post clearly shows that I wanted Eddy Curry to be traded, not Crawford or Randolph.
"I know exactly what you mean. I'm getting sick of Eddy Curry myself. He's one of the least productive centers in the NBA. He's overweight, he can't play defense, he can't rebound, he can't pass, he can't shoot free throws, he can barely make a lay up, he's foul prone, he's turnover prone, and he has zero heart. A guy like that shouldn't be making all that money. If Donnie Walsh trades Eddy Curry, I'm going to take back everything I ever said about Walsh."
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
i never answered the actual question, but imo id give walsh a B+. the handling of starbury was just terrible. if we didnt want him we should have bought him out in more peaceful terms, and personally i believed we should have at least tried him, becuase if he did something wrong we'd just let him go. but trading crawford and randolph was brilliant imo. it gives us cap flexibility and it does indeed sacrifice talent as others have mentioned on this thread, but im optimistic about us getting a strong FA class in 2010
I don't know why, but I get the biggest laugh when I read "tunafaggot"
You can't make this **** up.
The guy has to be angry about being some form of social oddity. A geek, fat, dead ugly, club foot, face herpes, albino, closet fag (most likely) or just a ***** that abuses people on the internet because they can't actually see his deformities? Something along those lines I'd say.
Not the most popular man on campus I'm sure.
KO's all he's got.
Marbury was all he had. That's where his online circle-jerkees praised him, because he agreed/sided with them. Now Marbury's gone and there's a new martyr up for grabs. The man who abolished Gaybcd's sweetheart.
Hint: Marbury & Chandler were the only two players that could keep up with speedy Nate's run n gun transition on this team.
Walsh gets the credit or blame for any of coach Dantoni good or bad decision making.
The handling of Marbury alone gives Walsh a C+ grade.....and thats not including what happen on draft night with our 6th pick for the much needed SG-Eric Gordon or C-Brook Lopez to start our Rebuilding-Mode.
Or trading a rookie contract NBA ready player Balkman (for nothing) whom B-Ball IQ and hustling-speed is ten times better than Q.Rich & Jefferies in the open court just to open a spot on the roster to sign Anthony Roberson.
What grade does Walsh deserve for those actions?
Trading Crawful for a scoring foward Harrington was a decent move that would've gave Walsh a "B" grade b/c Crawful talent and performance was the biggest cancer on the court with all that foolish stand-still cross-over dribbling in every offensive possesion.
But....the trade for Harrington only proved the big mistake in drafting a scoring foward Gallinari and trading a defensive rebounding foward in Balkman....so the Crawful for Harrington trade (max) grading is a "C+" for a two year contract.
However....everything changed when Walsh traded Zach Randolph and our bench defensive-guard Mardy Collins to make us have a 5 to 6-Man rotation which could've lead to season injuries to 4 decent rotation players (PF-Lee, SF-Chandler, SG/PG-Nate, and PG-Duhon) whom energy was gone in the middle of each 4th quarter.
Who do u grade for all those consistent Knicks losses with the 6-man rotation after the Zach Randolph trade?
Who do u grade for only having two guards in the rotation and one PF for 50 games? and no-center in the rotation throughout the season? and how do u grade the person responsible for this team in a weak conference?
Last edited by Kiyaman; Apr 02, 2009 at 08:30.