I guess some people don't want to get all excited about something that may not happen. I mean its not like we're a team on the rise and adding LJ would put us over the top. Even if we get him there still needs to be major work done to build a complete team.
Considering how well the Cavs have contended, im not sure we need that much mode work to win if Lebron comes. Joint signing of him and then Bosh (even Lee). And even if we don't flip Curry for more immediate-help, which is a very fair pt, considering we offer ourselves and Lebron further opportunity in but one season, i think we handily beat the Cavs in terms of desirability for who could win titles now and going forward.
Its not necessarily true, but what is until it actually happens. It's just probabilities. My position is that the probabilities are in our favor. I guess I'm treating unknowns as facts -- eg Bosh-- but if we sign Bron they seem probable enough to the pt where i feel comfortable treating them as virtual fact.
I can understand your point tho about some not wanting to get too excited about what-ifs and maybes and shit.
My professional background is probabilities and taking on risk and leaps of faith based on conjecture, so I can't help sometimes but prematurely ejac when thinking of all our possibilities, several of which I think are pretty probable.
Douglas
Lebron
Gallo
Bosh
Barron
Walker, Chandler, Serg, Curry as bench/assets.
Strong bench, big asset in Curry, possibly the best PF in the game going forward, certainly a top allstar in the present. And Gallo and Douglas' Defense and Range to spread the floor would fit perfectly with Lebron.
Putting aside the deals we --could-- make with those assets (Deandre Jordan, Curry+Collison, eg)....Wouldn't you say that that roster alone is far more desirable for Lebron than a 2011 Cavs? And then 2012, 2013 etc..Then take into the account $, and fame factors.