idk were u got the balkman stats but espn has curry leading in blocks but i know balkmans a good defender just saw on espn that he wasn't close in blocks...losing percentage doesn't mean shit to me it's just being on bad teams i dont think we'll agree on anything man lol and fyi i fukin hated isiah so don't say im a isiah whatever u called me cuz i hated seeing him smiling on the sidelines and post game conferences every time they lost...the worst coach and GM in history...crawford was the starting SG cuz no one else could shoot i cant say it anymore his defense sucked yea of course he has to work on it but he can shoot and thats why there called shooting guards...i'd keep him unless i know i have an offesive SG waiting to take his spot which we don't. and u said that no one expected balkman to be a good offensive player but yet u think hes an explosive offensive player so i dont get that but jus to rest my case...don't like balkman...crawford can take over a game an can shoot...needs defensive work definetly not arguing that... his salary is high if we can get a decent shooting SG with some defense go right ahead he can be trade bait but i like the kid and i would prefer not trading him..the knicks didnt lose because of crawford your blaming the season on one guy man..it was Isiah and all the other bullshit that this team went through on and off the court ruining the chemisty of this team and injuries making it harder to win. i hope this convo is done lol
Curry played more minutes than Balkman, but Balkman is the more productive shot blocker.
And on ESPN, Curry averaged .49 blocks in over 25 minutes. Balkman averaged .46 blocks in 14 minutes...basically half of Curry's playing time. Brother, just please stop; you're making a fool out of yourself now by not reading the stats correctly and coming here and trying to convince me you would rather have Curry as your anchor on help defense than Balkman. Balkman should of got 25 minutes a game and Curry should of got 14 minutes a game. Curry is such a terrible shot blocker; he wouldn't even record a .01 block in 14 minutes.
Losing percentage means something in reality, you may not to want to accept the reality of the situation, but I already presented. I can't help you if you have a problem accepting that Jamal Crawford is the biggest loser in the NBA. The Crawford Line is named in honor of New York Knicks guard Jamal Crawford, who has a career winning percentage of .307, worst among active players with at least 400 games played.
Crawford can't shoot either, he's always shooting around 38-40% FG and 31-33% 3pt. Its not that he has a bad jumpshot, he just has terrible shot selection and kills us every game with his bonehead chucks Theres no denying that. He's a chucking guard, not a shooting guard.
Be real my nigga, Crawford starts because he's Isiah son. He wear 11 in dedication for Isiah, Isiah did everything possible to acquire Crawford and he took the ball from the superior all star PG in Marbury and gave it to Jamal. Isiah had favorites and didn't care about losing percentages (like you) this is why I asked for your status as an Isiahsexual.
We need a defensive SG, not an offensive SG, haven't you learn anything from the last 3-4 seasons?
Crawford is replaceable by the following guys.
J. Johnson(better at everything)
R. Allen (better at everything)
J. Richardson (better at everything)
J. Terry (better shooter, defender, PG)
A. Iverson (better at everything)
R. Hamilton (better at everything)
M. Ellis (better at everything)
T. McGrady (better at everything)
M. Dunleavy (better at everything)
K. Bryant (better at everything)
M. Miller (better shooter, rebounder, more consistant, bigger)
M. Redd (better at everything)
V. Carter (better at everything)
M. Peterson (better shooter, defender)
W. Green (superior defender, can score physically instead of Chuck like Jamal)
R. Bell (All NBA defender, superior shooter, understands winning)
B. Roy (better at everything)
K. Martin (better at everything)
M. Ginobili (better at everything)
K. Durant (better at everything)
A. Parker (superior defender and shooter, role player for a winning team)
R. Brewer (superior defender shoots 50%, role player for a winning team)
D. Stevenson (superior defender and shooter, role player for a winning team)
F. Garcia (superior defender, slasher, shooter, younger, taller, longer, averages 18 ppg in per 40 minutes stats, more efficient player)
O. Mayo - (better at everything)
E. Gordon - (better at everything)
D. Gallinari - (better at everything)
So how can you seriously want to go to war with such a weak weapon like Crawford? He doesn't match up with the big boys.