TR1LL10N
Hannibal Lecter
If a deal has to be done, then fine. I just don't see the need to trade now as much as you. To me, the risk of Melo signing somewhere else is not that big of a deal. I don't see him as the great player that many of you do. He's a great scorer, one of the best, but he doesn't make the players around him better, he dominates the ball, turns it over a lot, is awful from outside, etc. Don't get me wrong, I think he's a great player. I just don't see the need to give up everything to get him. Particulalry because he's a free agent this summer. There are better options. And that is just my opinion.
Signing him this summer is the best option for the Knicks and the quickest and easiest path towards a championship. That's what I want.
A Gallo + Randolph + Curry + 2014 pick deal is fair to me. Nuggets get two young promising players, cap relief and a future pick. Considering their position, they should be happy with that.
And, like you said, this allows us to keep Chandler, who can play multiple positions either starting or coming off the bench. And we keep Fields. We become very close to contenders if that deal goes down. And I'm definitely down with that.
All the same things could be said about Kobe with regards to scoring and efficiency. Using those same type of "modern" stats Kobe is an inefficient sorer as well. I'm sure Jordan would be considered inefficient as well had they used that type of conditional/fractional stats. Yes, MJ made his teammates better and I'm not in anyway suggesting that Melo is as good as either. I think Melo will improve upon much of what you just said playing in NYC alongside Amare. My evidence for this assumption is his play on Team USA when he facilitated much of the offense and was arguably the MVP. (in D'ants offense BTW)
Last edited: