How about Von Wafer. Dude shoots 40% from 3, and isn't a bad Defender. And will most likely be Cheap if the rockets don't resign.
It's a less risky move just cuz the money will be less as opposed to AI. Considering how AI is not in our long term plans, it would be a complete waste of time to otherwise develop players.
The only risk with Von is that maybe his 40% 3 is inflated cuz Yao gets doubled and also is one of the best passing Centers.
Thats not the Iverson that is going to be a free agent.
The iverson that is is older, mor injury prone, and not able to produce as consistently as he did in that video.
1997-2005 AI
-Top of his game
-MVP (but got owned by Kobe-Shaq)
-4 scoring championships
2009 AI
-He is out this season
-12 years older...
-15 PPG! not 30
-Inconsistent
-He still NEEDS the ball in his hands to make a move. He isn't Rip Hamilton; someone who is best without the ball.
If it was that 97-05 iverson, i'd think about it. But is is not.
Plus, with how fast we play and how worn out he is, wouldn't he be TWICE as prone to injury?
After all, he was playing in a HALF COURT game with DET.
To me Iverson is like Marbury in that you need a certain supporting cast around them. They were favorites in the 90's but they don't help us now. You are right, we need strong interior D if we get them
I see the following PF's/C's available in Free Agency that i wouldn't mind getting (if they weren't resigned) Chris Andersen, Theo Ratliff, Rasheed Wallace, Antonio McDyess. Honestly don't know if Rasheed or Theo could play in this system.