Real NY Baller
Starter
@Broadway
Explain why it was flawed from the beginning. I would be curious to know where you pick the starting point.
When he was traded I knew we didn’t have the championship assets yet due to a depleted roster. I was banking on a good showing that year and a better run the next year (with better assets). That never really happened (for one reason or another) But, who was instrumental/ who was the main person responsible for still getting us to the post season both times?
Agree, so with the evidence that free agency showed us which there were a small crop of fans who knew this plan was flawed from the beginning going way back...knowing free agency would prove to be a fail......what would you have done with the 4th pick(knowing Carmelo would have no help in free agency?)
You weren't amongst the large mob of fans who thought free agency was gonna be a payoff did you? Not someone who has taken the time to break things down granually as you have. With no help in free agency...Melo has already shown over and over he's not capable of taking average rosters to new heights. Therefore what should have been done with the 4th pick?
I already gave several players that have certain skill sets to go along with mellos game. Melo plays from the corners, breaks down his defender to either penetrate, dish it or wish it. It’s his way of setting up the opposition. When the double team comes he can dish it in the paint or to a athletic cutting guard. As seen many times with Chandler and JR. swish…but we all know they were inconsistent and unreliable. I’ve posted a few people that can play that role and I’m sure there are more I’ve over looked. We need a big man that plays the boards and defense…offense is often made off of energetic defensive play. Melo gaining an 7 foot 3 team mate known for shooting from the outside is not a good fit…especially when “said” person isn’t hitting those shots. I don’t know of any player that can take an average roster (or ours) to the promise land, I’ve never seen that happened on any team, have you?
Explain why it was flawed from the beginning. I would be curious to know where you pick the starting point.
When he was traded I knew we didn’t have the championship assets yet due to a depleted roster. I was banking on a good showing that year and a better run the next year (with better assets). That never really happened (for one reason or another) But, who was instrumental/ who was the main person responsible for still getting us to the post season both times?
Agree, so with the evidence that free agency showed us which there were a small crop of fans who knew this plan was flawed from the beginning going way back...knowing free agency would prove to be a fail......what would you have done with the 4th pick(knowing Carmelo would have no help in free agency?)
You weren't amongst the large mob of fans who thought free agency was gonna be a payoff did you? Not someone who has taken the time to break things down granually as you have. With no help in free agency...Melo has already shown over and over he's not capable of taking average rosters to new heights. Therefore what should have been done with the 4th pick?
I already gave several players that have certain skill sets to go along with mellos game. Melo plays from the corners, breaks down his defender to either penetrate, dish it or wish it. It’s his way of setting up the opposition. When the double team comes he can dish it in the paint or to a athletic cutting guard. As seen many times with Chandler and JR. swish…but we all know they were inconsistent and unreliable. I’ve posted a few people that can play that role and I’m sure there are more I’ve over looked. We need a big man that plays the boards and defense…offense is often made off of energetic defensive play. Melo gaining an 7 foot 3 team mate known for shooting from the outside is not a good fit…especially when “said” person isn’t hitting those shots. I don’t know of any player that can take an average roster (or ours) to the promise land, I’ve never seen that happened on any team, have you?