I have a freedom of speech. If I disagree with Quentin Richardson going around telling people where they stand on the team, then I have a right. Read the article. It clearly states that Mike D'Antoni was pu$$y, so he sent Richardson to tell Marbury he wasn't playing, the night before the season started.Because that's not the part I'm talking about nor is it the part that I'm denying has any relevance.
The part I'm talking about is showing you that you did in fact talk about Q-Rich and his field goal percentage.
Edit: Nor am I lying, where have I lied?
You're just a little crybaby Team Starbury buttplugger...
WAHHH HE'S LYING AND MANIPULATING WHAT I SAID! WAHHHH
Get over yourself, I showed you exactly what I was talking about, never lied, never "manipulated", you just know you're wrong...keep on doing this:
It also states that Quentin Snitchardson told the media he doesn't consider Marbury his teammate, even though Richardson did not know the entire story about the Marbury and D'Antoni situation.
We now know the real reason why Marbury didn't play.
Marbury didn't play, because D'Antoni lied to him in the past, and he didn't know what to believe. He wanted to speak with Donnie Walsh, before suiting up to play. Rather than being honest with the media, D'Antoni lied and said Marbury refused to play, when in fact, he just wanted to speak to Donnie Walsh first.
P.S.- I know. Waa, your mother's a baby.
Read the article.