If you agree then why do keep saying Coach should have been playing him all along?
Mike D prudently benched Moz when he did and went w guys he could trust. You can't blame him for that. Mike D didn't know Moz would perform the way he did last. Sh*t nobody did...
Wow! The only way Moz should've played is if someone (coach) was convinced he could play at the level he did last night? Smh. Just quit posting.
To play like last night, and to CONTRIBUTE, GAIN CONFIDENCE, SKILL, A SENSE OF BELONGING AND READNESS, are two different things.
Many have stated he should have at least had spot duties, and obviously many were on to something.
To say MDA only played them after they were proven in practice is your pathetic attempt at saving face, when all you had to do was say...
"You know maybe some were on to something when they clammored to "PLAY" (not start, not get 40+ mins) the bigs, but you couldn't.
Difference is Moz wasnt inserted because the coach had confidence or wanted to see what he could do during yesterdays game. Injuries forced him to play the kid. He had every intention of benching him again when everyone came back healthy. This isnt that hard to understand.
As far as you car keys comment. HUH? The bottom line is the more you drive the better you get at it.
Vroooooom.... that's that airplane going over their heads again. A big fat 767 fully loaded.
Dnt waste your time as a thread is viewed as a tool to profess love and support to the threatened and complexed. We say play the bigs more, they say I support and love MDA who admittedly makes mistakes too but go unrecognized. Sad.
Now the exaggeration and spin doctoring will begin, and it'll start with the whole "MDA started moz and gave him a shot" followed by
"And now that he showed up in practice he earned minutes as if MDA knew this all along"
Hahaha....
As you mentioned KBlack, the fact remains it came AFTER an injury hence mda had no choice. FACT that makes all other arguments irrelevent