Consistency
Here's what differentiates the STARTERS from the BENCH, in my opinion.
It aint scoring - Both groups had better be able to score or they should not be on the floor, that is why they sub for one another because for one reason or another the group or a player is unable to score.
It aint defense - Both groups had better be able to defend (within reason of course, given that some will be better than others). Again that is why a defensive sub is made if a player or unit on the opposing team is going off.
It is decision making - Starters must have a better understanding of the game and make very good choices both defensively and offensively, especially in critical moments.
It is poise & confidence - Starters can't be rattled when things go wrong and must have the ability to rise to higher levels of performance as needed.
It is execution - Starters must be the best at executing the teams offense and defense.
IT IS CONSISTENCY- Starters have to be the most consistent players on both ends of the floor, night in and night out.
I think that one area where the bench is differentiated is in the energy level. I think that they have to come in with greater intensity since they usually do not play as many minutes. (btw, this is the reason why when the NYK make a come back they don't have energy to close out in a win)
So who on this team fits the profile of starters? I really can't tell. The starters have not shown themselves yet. Here's why:
Francis and Marbury - should be starters but they're still trying to figure out how to play together
Curry - Should be a starter but is a victim of questionable work ethic, sub-par defense (foul trouble) and a confused back-court (marbury & francis)
Frye - ????? seems to be improving a little but may just be the odd man out. His defense has improved from last year but defense is not his game. He needs to be the first, second or third scoring option when on the floor to be effective. With Curry, Marbury, Francis & Richardson on the floor his game will suffer.
Lee - Definitely playing like a starter but have problems guarding bigger PF in the league. I would be willing to start him a PF unless someone bette come along.
Jeffries - Is out with broken hand. Jury still out.
Richardson - Has proven that he should be a starter. Question is should he start at the 3 or the 2. I happen to think that he should start at the 2 spot, which would meant that either Francis or Marbury will have to go.
Definite strong bench: Crawford, Robinson, Balkman