TR1LL10N
Hannibal Lecter
NyKuniversity
I went back to look for stats on Robinson in college...
2004-2005
Games played: 35 Rebounds/game: 3.9
Points/game: 16.4 Assists/game: 4.5
FG Pct: 46.3 Turnovers/game: 2.0
3FG Pct: 38.5 Assist/turnover ratio: 2.2
FT Pct: 78.2 Steals/game: 1.7
Blocks/game: 0.2
He started every game his last year with the Huskies yet only average 4.5 assists with a 2.2 turnover ratio. Where has he ever been a true PG?
2003-2004
Games played: 31 Rebounds/game: 3.9
Points/game: 13.2 Assists/game: 2.7
FG Pct: 44.7 Turnovers/game: 2.0
3FG Pct: 35.4 Assist/turnover ratio: 1.4
FT Pct: 85.3 Steals/game: 1.7
Blocks/game: 0.1
2002-2003
Games played: 23 Rebounds/game: 3.9
Points/game: 13.0 Assists/game: 2.3
FG Pct: 46.2 Turnovers/game: 1.8
3FG Pct: 25.7 Assist/turnover ratio: 1.2
FT Pct: 71.9 Steals/game: 1.1
Those are not the stats of a PG...they are the stats of a scoring combo guard. Nate needs to dominate the ball to create HIS OWN SHOTS...he is not interested in orchestrating an offense. No where is his career has he ever been touted as a pure PG. Do you honestly think he can run the point in Dant's system on a nightly basis? FOr all of Duhon's faults he is careful with ball, gets Lee his shots and is the starting PG on the best Knicks team in over 5 years. Add to the fact that Duhon has limited playoff experience and it's clear at this point he is our best option at PG. Douglas if given a chance may be able to be better but we are in a playoff hunt right now so why would we rock the boat? If we continue to go 2-8 and eliminate our chances at a playoff appearance then I will be happy to experiment with who ever. That said I still don't think Nate has ever shown that he can be a starting PG let alone a started for Dan'ts offense.
I went back to look for stats on Robinson in college...
2004-2005
Games played: 35 Rebounds/game: 3.9
Points/game: 16.4 Assists/game: 4.5
FG Pct: 46.3 Turnovers/game: 2.0
3FG Pct: 38.5 Assist/turnover ratio: 2.2
FT Pct: 78.2 Steals/game: 1.7
Blocks/game: 0.2
He started every game his last year with the Huskies yet only average 4.5 assists with a 2.2 turnover ratio. Where has he ever been a true PG?
2003-2004
Games played: 31 Rebounds/game: 3.9
Points/game: 13.2 Assists/game: 2.7
FG Pct: 44.7 Turnovers/game: 2.0
3FG Pct: 35.4 Assist/turnover ratio: 1.4
FT Pct: 85.3 Steals/game: 1.7
Blocks/game: 0.1
2002-2003
Games played: 23 Rebounds/game: 3.9
Points/game: 13.0 Assists/game: 2.3
FG Pct: 46.2 Turnovers/game: 1.8
3FG Pct: 25.7 Assist/turnover ratio: 1.2
FT Pct: 71.9 Steals/game: 1.1
Those are not the stats of a PG...they are the stats of a scoring combo guard. Nate needs to dominate the ball to create HIS OWN SHOTS...he is not interested in orchestrating an offense. No where is his career has he ever been touted as a pure PG. Do you honestly think he can run the point in Dant's system on a nightly basis? FOr all of Duhon's faults he is careful with ball, gets Lee his shots and is the starting PG on the best Knicks team in over 5 years. Add to the fact that Duhon has limited playoff experience and it's clear at this point he is our best option at PG. Douglas if given a chance may be able to be better but we are in a playoff hunt right now so why would we rock the boat? If we continue to go 2-8 and eliminate our chances at a playoff appearance then I will be happy to experiment with who ever. That said I still don't think Nate has ever shown that he can be a starting PG let alone a started for Dan'ts offense.