TR1LL10N
Hannibal Lecter
It sounded like you were crying.
You can't be laughing at someone that was already laughing at you.
Maturity? Crying on the internet = maturity at its finest, right?
Gayest thing ever read in life = your birth certificate.
You post lack hilarity, so retire yourself.
Grow up? Like I said, crying on the internet = maturity? You the "man" here.
I know I'm a tough sob, I would whop that ass, glad you know this, irrelevant boring poster.
How can we really estimate how long my new team will gain "chemistry"? I mean, Garcia, Wallace are some really good chemistry guys, along with Gallinari who already gets respect on the court and gets the offense going.
Chemistry will not change honestly.
Look at how our team now developed chemistry.
With a core of Duhon/Lee still here and D'Antoni and his system, not much will change expect a little more defense, experience and better shooters.
This is why I feel moves like this will push us to a more positive direction. eace:
I know we're not going to trade the entire ROSTER, but we NEED too.
Salmons has a lot of value for SAC (their all around guy), its kinda like Orlando trading Hedo. Garcia is more expendable especially when they get a PG in return.
There is no substance really to declaring Gallinari a foul machine.
All bench players who play limited minutes will be more anxious on the court and commit fouls more than usualy.
Gallinari is a smart guy on defense, he isn't going to be like a Peter John Ramos or some hack off the bench.
Once he gets more comfortable (which shouldn't be too soon), a foul machine would be the last thing Gallinari would be.
It's a good thing that Gallinari is a "foul machine" now, it shows how much effort he puts into defense, probably more effort we've seen from the Knicks in in the last 4 years combined. Gallinari's fouls are positive...they showcase effort, intensity and denial for the opponent to score...where as a guy like Curry fouls out of defeat on defense, offensive fouls...etc.
Do you realize when you number down things, you look like an angry frustrated teenage girl ranting on AOL. Do you realize that? Yes? No? :teeth:
Doesn't matter what you said.
You presented your argument in favor of LOSING, because my argument was to try to win as much as possible while being under the cap and you denied it. If you're not in favor of winning now then what are you in favor of? Don't fool yourself.
Playoff contention isn't PLAYOFFS, thats not good enough security.
You sound mad, I could honestly breakdown my life and make you feel inferior as you feel on here. Good job on describing yourself and trying to project your insecurities in me. Small dick, middle aged, ferrari? Damn dude, did you really have to expose yourself like that? I'm loving my life and myself, I wish I could say the same about you.
Son, you don't know a damn thing about "developing youth" or professional athletes. You just play your 2k9 and expect dudes with "potential" to grow.
This isn't the NBDL, its the NBA. You play to compete and win, nothing else.
Everyone on this team is expandable except Lee and Gallinari.
Trading a mid 1st round pick in a weak draft? Oh no...thats so ISIAH like...I mean, theres going to be another Lamarcus Aldridge or Andrew Bynum in 2009 with our pick. Right, fool?
I got the most credibility on this site, while I just remember you as some fool I burnt a long time ago. I don't honestly remember any of your post, I'm glad you remember mine.
As for Duhon, he's a serviceable PG, Marbury is still more skilled/talented/experienced. Duhon is definitely not the PG of the future for this franchise, don't be so silly now. His defense gets overrated, even though its better than most, and there a dozen of PG's out there that can average the assist numbers he averages. I wish we had a more efficient PENETRATOR, that would open up this offense.
Marbury is great.
I'm talking about the fans.
We need more hardcore NYers in the stands...instead of fans with the masculinity and toughness of TRILLION.
I don't like how Gallo is being used.
With the way he's playing, he's obviously at 90-100%
F*ck slow...Gallinari is a professional, he's been pro since he was a teen. I guarantee once he starts getting over 25 minutes consistently, he will wow you guys...he's capable of basically everything offensively.
Pistons, eh.
How much can we get better than? Honestly.
Harrington/Chandler are our first options.
Why must we set ourselves up for losing by having such a low quality 1-2 punch?
How do you know we will be sent back in preseason with a trade?
Especially a trade that improves the quality and diversity of the team...we will add more dimensions we never had before.
You act like when NBA teams make trades, they never dramatically improve or improve slightly.
Its a 50/50 with a lot of factors depending on it.
The factors in these deals are to our favor...I honestly don't see how we will be set back.
I know these deals will never happened because Walsh is too conservative, but adding two team players to this starting 5 in Wallace and Garcia will only optimize our performance on the court...instead of being led by a selfish low IQ Harrington and another low IQ player in Chandler.
Just an honest outlook on it.
Randolph > Harrington.
Randolph's contract was a killer though.
Again, no one is advocating losing anything. Fact is we are playing the best ball in years and you want to trade away our entire team. Keep repeating shit I did not say all you want but you arent fooling anyone but yourself.
We both know you remember exactly who I am hence why you reacted like a little bitch when I respectfully disagreed with your post. Oh and you never burnt me, not then, not now, not ever.
Exposed myself? Ha! All anyone needs to do is go to your weak ass myspace page to see a young boy who looks more Indian than Latin with a big crooked ass nose. :teeth: Let me guess, you forgot you werent hidden behind a computer screen and mouthed off to the wrong dude and got your nose broke!:teeth: Oh and let me help your girl out...send her to either of these sites cause..well dams she needs it dog!
http://www.acne.org/
http://www.proactiv.com/