RunningJumper
Super Moderator
I see some David Lee shots in here. I don't get it. Lee clearly has game. His numbers went down with the Warriors, but they had Monta and Curry.
Yeah he wasn't good on defense with us, although some Warriors fans said he stepped up lol. I dunno though, I haven't seen enough Warriors games to judge.Lee's still great, his one problem was and still is defense, he's a black hole on defense.
This thread for grown folks only, close your mouth faggit
eat a dikk lame
Anyone familiar with basketball could see Z-Bo's talent with us. He was a good player on a bad team. He is the type of player that needs a good defensive center next to him but so is Dirk Nowitzki, is he a bad player?
I could give a fukk less if his homie gets busted for sellin weed, whats that got to do with him and how good of a basketball player he is?
I am happy with the current Knicks team but i dont see anything wrong with me or anyone else on here being a Z-Bo fan, as long as we got your permission boss
Little sensitive aren't we.....
I would love to pull up the past threads when everyone bitched and moan about Randolph not playing defense....
If you read this thread, you will see that that isn't true. Some people on here are convinced they were moved for other reasons.
You Pro-Randolph fans are such bandwagoners...
When he was with the Knicks his defense sucked. He would miss a shot or not get a call and sit there complaining rather then hustle back on defense...
The guy has definetly grown up and matured into a star player.....But thats not who he was with the Knicks.....
STAT was in the 2010 class - as was LeBron, Bosh, Wade, Boozer, Dirk, Allen, Shaq - the goal was always to get under the cap BEFORE the 2010 offseason for the stated purpose of having cards to play in the 2010 offseason. In fact, Walsh said coming in his goal was to get under the cap...I don't know why you bother arguing that his goal was not to get under the cap.
His stated goal coming in was to gain back cap flexibility that Isiah had lost us.
No he couldn't have done that...mostly b/c most of the guys you mention were essentially untradeable before the 2010 offseason.
Randolph costs less because he isn't as good. I'm not saying Randolph is bad - but the fact is Randolph isn't a gamechanger to the extent Amare is. Do you think that this team would have done as well if you replace Amare with ZBo early in the year, when STAT carried this entire team on his back? Hell, would Carmelo have demanded to come here to play with ZBo?
Yes, it would have been nice to dump Curry instead of Randolph. But nobody was going to take on Curry b/c it was essentially lost money on a non-expiring deal. We lost the best players on our team because (surprise!) they were the best players on the team. Teams aren't just going to take on OUR shitty contracts for no reason...teams WERE willing to take on extended deals for Z-Bo and Crawford BECAUSE they were good...