Crawford has contributed to more losing.
Ever since his arrival, we've gotten worse.
Marbury's arrival lead to a playoff appearance.
Marbury is in the best shape of his life, calling him washed up makes you a failure in assessing elite athletes.
Marbury can't pass?
He has 6,396 assist in his career.
22nd of all time in NBA history.
You're brilliant.
Crawford doesn't rebound
doesn't play defense
doesn't make right decesions with the ball
doesn't make the right passes or play within the offense as he should.
He does
chuck
travel
lose a lot
does a lot of clown tricks with the ball
shoot under 40% FG
shoots 33% 3pt.
One dimensional scorer.
Harrington actually shoots well for a SF/PF hybrid, better than Crawford PG/SG hybrid. PG/SG are suppose to have more range on the perimeter, but Crawford is below average therefor he doesn't.
Harrington averages in per 36 mins
16 ppg
7 rebs
45% FG
36% 3pt
on 2 turnovers.
Crawford averages in per 36 mins
16 ppg
3 rebs
40% FG
34% 3pt
2.4 turnovers
Harrington is a more productive athlete, better talent, and more skilled. Plus, Harrington has proven he can preform in the playoffs.
Harrington has played a full NBA season before, Crawford hasn't.
2003-04 NBA 521 (3)
2004-05 NBA 512 (6)
2007-08 NBA 494 (6)
Crawford is one of the biggest chuckers in the league.
A level chucker.
Harrington is just a C level chucker, plus theres nothing wrong with chucking when you're in the 37-40% 3pt range.
Crawford is in the 30-35% range.