OriginalKnickGrandson
Starter
Yep, not bashing you just responding to a point.
There's always two sides to every story, who knows.
Great post! This guy smokin is gonna be a nice addition to KO.com
1. Answer
2. Open mind
Yep, not bashing you just responding to a point.
There's always two sides to every story, who knows.
Stop trying to push creationism on people that don't believe in it and stop presenting it as fact when even people that agree with it have to admit it's not proven.
Another thought.Yep, not bashing you just responding to a point.
However I don't see how you can be so sure about this fault being in the Knicks. None of us know what goes on behind closed doors, people in the organization could be under orders to handle Steph with kid gloves in the hope he will/would have taken a reduced buyout if his behaviour wasn't publicized.
Obviously I'm not saying this is fact, just a possible theory to why everyone in the franchise seems to hate him though he appears not to have done anything severely out of line before possibly refusing to play. It's equally possible that he has acted like a saint all season and someone in the Knicks management holds a grudge.
There's always two sides to every story, who knows.
Im very short on time. I just wanna say that i respect donnie walsh as a person. I respect Mike D'antoni as an offensive mastermind but hes a bitch.
And for all you haters talkin about how starbury deserved this because of karma, good deeds erase bad deeds. Hes donated as much money as any other athlete. He lost 2 family members (his pops and his aunt), and his basketball mentor who he had known since he was young.
Marbury is innocent until proven guilty. D'Antoni is 100% wrong for what he is doing. Quentin Richardson is 100% wrong for what he said to the media, too. It made him look like the hypocrite and snitch he really is.
In an interview, David Lee said he never had any problems with Marbury. Even Duhon said that maybe he should have shown more support for Marbury, in an interview.
Marbury is innocent until proven guilty. D'Antoni is 100% wrong for what he is doing. Quentin Richardson is 100% wrong for what he said to the media, too. It made him look like the hypocrite and snitch he really is.
In an interview, David Lee said he never had any problems with Marbury. Even Duhon said that maybe he should have shown more support for Marbury, in an interview.
Newsday said:For those scoring at home, D'Antoni is the fourth straight Knicks coach with whom Marbury has had an issue in five seasons. In general manager circles, Marbury has been referred to as "the Mike Tyson of the NBA."
"I do not think a lot of teams will have an interest, but I think there would be at least a couple of teams," one Eastern Conference team executive said. He added, "It will be fun to follow from the sidelines."
A Western Conference GM said a team might take a chance on Marbury, "especially if they have had an injury and feel like he can help them getting to the playoffs." He added, "I would be surprised if he gets more than a minimum [contract], though."
A GM of another Western Conference team was asked what kind of interest Marbury might attract around the league. "I can only speak for us," he said. "Highly unlikely."
The Miami Heat, which reportedly is shopping Shawn Marion, was believed to have had some curiosity about Marbury at the start of the season. A source told Newsday that the Knicks have given the Heat "a standing offer" of Marbury for Marion, but it appears Miami's interest has fizzled, especially after the latest issue. The Mavericks, who need a backup for Jason Kidd, seem a possible destination.
Why is it that Marbury is innocent until proved guilty but D'Antoni is not? Again we only have two sides of a confusing and puzzling story.
In terms of Q, him and Steph have had problem for a long time apparently stemming back to a locker room incident. Should Q have stayed out? Probably. But then you go and cite Duhon saying maybe he should have shown more support. If Q has to stay out on D'Antoni's side I think Duhon should stay out on Steph's side, it's only fair to ridicule BOTH interferences.
D'Antoni is guilty for not giving Marbury a chance and being unethical as a professional.
Slightly new report from News Day.
http://www.newsday.com/sports/basketball/ny-spknix025949243dec02,0,215102.story
No one is going to offer or accept a Marbury trade offer while negotiations are in process. Why trade for a guy that you can get for the vet exemption? I don't think a buyout will happen. It looks like Dolan doesn't want to pay Marbury in full and Marbury wont take less then 99%, that's not a compromise on ether side. I could be wrong but expect to live with this saga until later in the season or until a trade can be reached. Marbury for Marion would be ideal. Still, it looks grim. No one wants Marbury.
D'Antoni is guilty for not giving Marbury a chance and being unethical as a professional.
D'Antoni is guilty for not giving Marbury a chance and being unethical as a professional.
I'm not sure he was proven to be unethical. He's guilty for not giving Marbury a chance but then Marbury is guilty for choosing to sit on the bench, no?