Melo might have lost twice to a lower seed... But both times the lower seed werent teams with more Ls.... Utah is perfct example.... Lower seed.... Yes. But had the same record as Melo that year. So, point to the one colossal upset Melo succombed to in the playoffs?
You said KP not in same universe as AD... I showed you that his rookie stats say otherwise. I didnt even talk about the intangibles.... Maturity, IQ, makeup make him seem older and wiser beyond his years... His passing skills (at time)... Maybe you should avoid hyperbole.
I mean... Comparing stats from a second round pick to a lottery pick says what exactly? Comparing the stats from the 4th pick in the draft, with the weight of those expectations, of a relatively unknown commodity to the 1st pick in the draft (a similar player... Both tall with unique offensive game... Who blocks shots).... What else do we have to go on? The hunch of a couch potato over every expert in the sport?
With that said... Yes... The Melo trade was a failure... But to say DEN won? No way. Denver was able to make sure Melo never could make in NY... Made it a pyrrhic victory.... But they never made it out of first round since the trade either.... Credit them for finding assets in the draft, and for slowly rebuilding... But that's bc their front office did a good job and they would've done the same thing even without the trade... Just like we bungled drafting Shumpert over Faired.
no you can't have it both ways.. my point was landry fields a guy many was high on had better stats as a rookie than Harden, doesn't matter where they were drafted...
You see things in porzingis looking through your knicks glasses.. I will tell you this, another second round pick that denver has jokic has everything you say porzingis has and here is the kicker, he actually plays like a big man... You tend to want to change the story, the situation and the level of talent around any player in a knick uniform, from your defense of carmelo to your anointing porzings as the next coming.. I mean where is the objectivity here?
what i find so funny here is that you want porzingis to be so great, well how did the knicks get him? drafting, yet you still defend the ridiculous trade that brought carmelo here and cost us numerous picks and young players.. again can't have it both ways..
you can make all the excuses for carmelo, but the key is, he lost twice to lower seeds when in Denver, teams that he was supposed to be the difference maker against, the truth is, he never has been in denver and damn sure hasn't been in NY, nothing short of an utter failure... for what the knicks spent they just got pennies on the dollar.. the knicks could have done absolutely nothing over the past 5 years and still been in the same position if not better by default..
Denver not making out of the first round is meaningless, it has nothing to do with the knicks, Denver is pretty much set up to do whatever they want, and in the end, that is pretty much what they asked for when they were forced to trade that malcontent.. what did the knicks get?