We don't get a defensive center at all. Brown is useless. For that trade we lose our 3 top scorers for only scorer on the Lakers. Who do the Knicks have besides Marbury who can put up points when Kobe has an off game? Curry is still developing and he is going to be a beast in few seasons. This is a very bad trade that will haunt the Knicks in the future if it ever went through.
We have the worst post defense in the NBA, are you serious with that?
We have Lee who can give you 10-15 points and can easily replace Randolph.
You don't know what Curry is going to be in 5 years, stop predicting the future.
You don't see no future in Balkman, Lee, and Collins? SMH @ you...you need a little more faith in the youth.
Kobe is better than Curry/Randolph combined. Kobe is a #1 player and a MVP candidate each season who's only getting better and maturing his game each season.
Si Pendejo.BTW,you traded away both of our low post scorers you dimwit! How do we play inside out offense? Lee,Rose,Brown or Mihm have ZERO post game.How do we win without an inside low post presence pendejo? Please explain!!!!!!!
How do we win with no post defense and a lot of turnovers by two selfish big men? Has that ever be done before in the history of the NBA?
Lee, and Mihm have post games, they're not power post games but they both have the aiblity to score in the post. That isn't the most important thing.
We get the best player in the NBA, keep Lee, Balkman and Collins.
Excellent trade.
lol, you use the word "dimwit". I know you're not from NYC, conyaso.
First off it wont go throught cause first they will want Lee. No one wants Marbury so thats out of the question cause he wants to play ball in Europe next year and actually every team in the league did better except the timberwolves when he left. Now getting rid of Zach and Curry are you out of your mind Kobe needs to play an inside out game so you need on of the other actually i would rather keep Zach i love Curry but Zach can do so much more then curry with his outside shot sorry thats just my opinion. well LA will probably want Lee Nate Crawford and i would give them Curry not sure if it would work but something like that would probably be the best scenario plus a first round pick or two who knows.
:gony:
It would go threw actually, Lakers would prefer Randolph over Lee in a minute.
Marbury is a top 10 PG, you have to be retarded to think NO ONE IN THE NBA wants Marbury.
Kobe got the Lakers to playoffs in the WESTERN conference with no consistent post scorers.
You're right about one thing, you're not very sure.
My trade is legit, this may sound funny but I tried in NBA 2k8...I simulated and Knicks won over 50 games on the span of 5 years, and got one championship against the Suns in 7.
Its just a thought for the positive direction. Curry has never lead a team to the playoffs in his career, and Randolph is a loser. Kobe is the complete opposite.
WE NEED TO RESPOND TO WHAT BOSTON DID, BOSTON ADDED TWO HALL OF FAMERS AND MOVED OUT OF THE POOL OF LOTTERY TEAMS INTO THE ELITES.
Getting Kobe would guarantee us a spot in the playoffs and success in the future. We don't know yet Curry or Randolph can do that.
BTW, center is such an overrated position, people want Shaq or Yao at center, but Spurs got Elson at the C spot and sitll manage to be successful, same with Pistons who have Nazr. We'll be excellent at 4 positions, and have a guy who's only good at post defense (our weaknesses). Win win win for the Knicks.