i agree that gallinari will be better than lopez in about 2 years. but you cant bash lopez like you did. he is a good center right now, who will be a great center next year. and lopez isnt slow for his position, gallinari is sadly. and jordan hill a frontline version of danny granger? its been pissing me off at how stupid this forum can be. first lawrence frank, then some1 callin gallo kyle korver, and now this? wtf? danny granger?? you making yourself look foolish. jordan hill has NOTHING in common with danny granger other than they are both black. and then u trying to say value wise?? top 5 pick?? over rubio, jennings, lawson, evans, griffen, flynn, harden?? gtfo
1.lopez is team hasn't won a game.ok, maybe i over did it with shitting on him, I'm just not a fan, i got carried away.
2.again, for the third time, I'm talking about VALUE in comparing granger with hill.
you want to say hill won't be better than rubio, ok, at this point they've played how much time in the nba in comparison to each other in the league?
a good "big" is more VALUABLE than a good guard.rubio will be nothing more than a good guard.
gallinari looked like pretty atheletic in italy, now his back is fine, yet you say he's slow for his position; could it be because of the speed of the euro game compared to the nba game?
that won't affect rubio though right? :teeth: a pg with a ****ing set shot, in comparison to a big live active body with a decent jumper a good motor, and athletisicm, and who's shown abilty to block shots.
but yeah, a rubio will be more valuable in the nba.ok.
I'm not even going to get into the other guys.cause i don't need to.you gotta it all figured out, jerkoff.
clearly, every prospect thats not in a knick uniform is better than those that are.
and no, i don't have "****ing" down syndrome.and no i won't gtfo.you can eat a dick though.just saying.....