No disrespect, but are you crazy? Zach Randolph has 1 less year on his contract than Hinrich. Hinrich makes 11 million dollars a year. Do you wanna be over the cap until 2013? Also, Hinrich played a lot worse in the 07-08 season than he did in the 06-07 season. Isiah Thomas already made tons of trades where we got the garbage that the other team didn't want. The Knicks actually have two of the leftovers that Chicago didn't want(Jamal Crawford and Eddy Curry) and it cost us capspace and lottery picks. Kirk Hinrich is a good leader, on the floor, but f**k the Bulls. I don't wanna give them anymore help. Isiah already helped them enough.Zach Randolph straight up for Heinrich works out for both teams i think. I would love that deal
I wouldnt do it... EWING JR!!
Hinrich for Randolph would be a horrible trade. We would just be helping the Bulls save 1 year where they would've had to give Hinrich 11 million dollars. Also, the Bulls would have a killer lineup, with Randolph.kirk has one eaxtra year but will save the knicks bout 8mil in cap space for 2010 if we trade him for zach. but d'antoni doesn't think he can run his system:beer:
Hinrich for Randolph would be a horrible trade. We would just be helping the Bulls save 1 year where they would've had to give Hinrich 11 million dollars. Also, the Bulls would have a killer lineup, with Randolph.
Let's take a look:
PG Derrick Rose
SG Ben Gordon
SF Luol Deng
PF Zach Randolph
C Drew Gooden
The Knicks would be stuck with 3 big contracts from the Bulls-Hinrich's, Crawford's, and Curry's.
Also, I don't know where you get your facts from. Hinrich has 1 more year than Randolph. That means that even though we would be saving 8 million dollars, we would also be losing 11 million dollars, because we would have had to keep Hinrich for 1 more year than if we had Randolph.