in my first act as modulating moderator, i have merged the LIN WILL BE RESIGNED thread with ALL THINGS LIN. please, KO posters, think about posting each and every thought to respective folders; believe you me, most KO posters read all new posts, so your pertinent thoughts will NOT go unnoticed, and discussions shall ensue.
bless you all.
:beer:
I hope we resign him, my dream and hope was to build around a starting backcourt of Lin and Shumpert in 2015+
Right now we're the oldest team and by no means good enough to beat Miami.
We gotta think about the future, when the Melo, STAT, Wade, Lebron generation start to decline.
A Lin/Shumpert backcourt looks intriguing to me.
But what do I say, it's the Knicks and Dolan is the owner so they'll piss their future away like always for immediate success which won't come.
Or maybe they show common sense this time, but our recent moves don't suggest that. Kidd? Felton? Camby? Kurt Thomas? Really?
I used to love Thomas and especially Camby, but this ain't 99.
Felton is a fat mofo who makes Melo look diced to the bone.
Kidd could be Nash's grandpa and apparently still likes to visit police stations.....
Like I said a long time ago, worst managed team in sports.
^haha. 300 Billion lost... Dolan would be skewered by Dolan Sr.
The stock market? Really?! Is this is how low Lin fans have stooped? Making threads about the effect Lin's imminent departure will have on MSG stocks? To be completely honest I don't give two fuks about MSG stocks, whether Lin remains a part of the team, or whether any of his groupies remain Knicks fans after he has gone. This ex (and potentially future) D-Leaguer should not be monopolising what has already been a pretty successful off-season. Over the past two weeks, this team has added experience, talent. defensive depth, and has also re-signed players who were incredibly useful for us last season. Yet people can't see past this Lin saga. The fact is that you are all stressing over Lin more than he is. He couldn't care less whether he remains a Knick or not (evidently) so why do you lot? This thread is the eptome of desperation.
Excuse my ignorance but is it possible that they are waiting till the last minute so houston can't make another offer after they match? Or is that not how matching works? I'm still a bit unclear on it so if anyone can drop some knowledge it would be much appreciated.
Ok, cool, thanks for the explanation.uncle robo. +1 rep. Follow up question: can we use our amnesty clause in the third year on lin?
Just trying to think of possible solutions or explanations on why they haven't matched.
If the player?s salary payments are spread-out using the Stretch provision, the team may elect to stretch the salary cap charge to match2. For example, if two seasons remain on the player?s contract when he is waived, and the payment is spread-out over five years per the Stretch provision, then the team may elect to spread-out the salary cap hit over those same five years.
In other words, the Knicks will have the option after the 2013-2014 season to waive Jeremy Lin, take his third-year $15 million salary and spread it out with its cap hit over the following three seasons. In each of those three seasons, the Knicks would have $5 million of dead money on the cap. Doing that would all but eliminate the insane luxury tax payment the Knicks would have to endure in 2014-2015, which is supposedly stopping them from re-signing Lin.
Aah, I see. Well, I'm all out of ideas then, lol. Only thing we can do is try and trade him before the third year, i guess.
The new CBA included a provision to make it much easier for teams to release players with bad contracts. It?s called the stretch provision. Here it is right out of Larry Coon?s invaluable CBA FAQ that can be found here: cbafaq.com.
Otherwise (if the contract or extension was signed under the current CBA), the remaining guaranteed salary is paid over twice the number of remaining years, plus one, per the Stretch provision:
If the player?s salary payments are spread-out using the Stretch provision, the team may elect to stretch the salary cap charge to match2. For example, if two seasons remain on the player?s contract when he is waived, and the payment is spread-out over five years per the Stretch provision, then the team may elect to spread-out the salary cap hit over those same five years.
In other words, the Knicks will have the option after the 2013-2014 season to waive Jeremy Lin, take his third-year $15 million salary and spread it out with its cap hit over the following three seasons. In each of those three seasons, the Knicks would have $5 million of dead money on the cap. Doing that would all but eliminate the insane luxury tax payment the Knicks would have to endure in 2014-2015, which is supposedly stopping them from re-signing Lin.