Except Wade was much much better than him in college on offense.
So no he is not close to "identical" to Wade.
Because averaging 14 PPG is average for a rookie? What? He actually averaged 16 PPG on 46% shooting, which is pretty damn good for a rookie and a higher percent than Iman shot IN COLLEGE. Also are you forgetting that Wade was much much better than Iman coming out of college? Why are you even comparing the two, it's just unfair to Iman and you're putting ridiculous expectations on him.
There have been so many guys who have "all the physical tools to be a force". That is good to have, but comparing Shumpert to Wade is a terrible comparison. Why not compare him to guys who actually had comparable stats to him in college? Or other "athletic guys with physical tools" who aren't named Dwyane Wade? You're just setting yourself up for disappointment comparing the 17th pick in a weak draft to a top 5 pick in one of the best drafts of all time.
I am comparing him to Dwade because of the physicality
once again I am not saying he will be dwayne wade
what I am saying is he has all of the physical gifts if not more, than what wade had, with similar build, height, vertical, wing span, and defensive quickness
Why must every one pick apart things in such a deep rooted argumentative stance, and read the EXACT WORDS THAT I AM SAYING
HE LOOOOOKS IDENTICAL TO WADe
looks if you cast a shadow of the both of them against a wall, they would stand almost identical in physical features.
so my point was, some one as athletically gifted as a dwyane wade, the fact that our 17th pick is identical in athleticism, probably the most overal athletic player in the draft, to compliment what we alread have
could be the steal of the draft
I sware people love to just hear them selves type, when they argue againsts some of the points on this forum.
I never said he was an IDENTICAL PLAYER
I said he LOOKS IDENTICAL
readdddddd people
thank you