wow!! are they seriously trading Crawford away!!? Crawford has pretty much single handedly given the knicks the wins they have with his starts and threes...sure Z has his daily points but WOW sending Crawford away is a bold move...Harrington has some shoes to fill
what do people not like about crawford? I don't get it. he's mad streaky but he looks like he's getting more consistent
Tim Thomas had his best year under D'Antoni.
I disagree with this trade. Jamal Crawford was playing well this season. The Knicks should have tried to get rid of Eddy Curry and Quentin Richardson, instead. They both suck, and they're both overpaid. Now that the Knicks lost Crawford, they're going to have to look for Chris Duhon and Quentin Richardson for offense. Good luck
Nate Robinson is not a shooting guard, and as good as he is, he can't average 20 a game. The Knicks should not have traded Jamal Crawford, because he was playing well. As a GM, your goal is to get rid of the people who are not producing, not the people that are. I used to criticize Crawford, because his game was extremely inconsistent and one dimensional. But he's really turned it on this year. The Warriors got the best out of this trade. Al Harrington ain't all that. He was the best player on a 13-69 Atlanta Hawk team.WHAT ABOUT NATE ABCD? IF HE STARTS HE CAN GIVE U THE SAME OFFENSE LIKE CRAWFORD AND MORE ENERGY AND EXCIMENT.
Nate Robinson is not a shooting guard, and as good as he is, he can't average 20 a game. The Knicks should not have traded Jamal Crawford, because he was playing well. As a GM, your goal is to get rid of the people who are not producing, not the people that are. I used to criticize Crawford, because his game was extremely inconsistent and one dimensional. But he's really turned it on this year. The Warriors got the best out of this trade. Al Harrington ain't all that. He was the best player on a 13-69 Atlanta Hawk team.
Well, I don't agree. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how this one turns out. It would've been nice if the Knicks would have traded Eddy Curry, Jerome James, or Quentin Richardson instead but I guess it wasn't in the cards for Walsh.NATE 2008 STATS 13.9PPG, 4.4AST, 2.1STL, .415 3p%,TO 1.91, 28.8mpg
JAMAL 2008 STATS 19.6PPG, 4.4AST, .82STL, .455 3P%,TO 2.36, 35.6MPG
I know he s not a sg but he s not a pure pg neither more like a combo guard
and with an extra 7mpg his PPG will get close to j c and everything else should be better.
Dont get me wrong I like how J C played so far (except couple games) but getting rid of one of our bigger contracts make this a good trade.
Just my oppinion
Does anyone else feel like we just tanked this season? Maby its for the betterment of the team, I don't know? It will put us in better financial situation for 2010..... witch is nice, but will LeBron and others come here? It will also most likely net us a better draft pick...... witch is also nice, but will we waist the pick? (again!) and will the Knicks even be worth watching this season?..... or next for that matter? If were going to clear the roster for a fresh slate in 2010 dosen't that mean 2 more seasons of losing in NY? I guess I like it for the future, but our pressant looks like crap!
http://www.dailybreeze.com/sports/ci_11043027
What the hell! There are all sorts or reports (just like The Zach to Memphis trade reports) all over saying this deal is not only iminent, but is done! Please who ever finds any articles confirming or denying this deal please post it!