Of course I can have it both ways... if someone strikes out with the bases loaded 3 times in 3 at bats he's the goat of the game, but if he wins the game with a walk off homer in his 4th and final at bat he's the hero of the game.... so i'm not sure what logic you are using in saying can't have it both ways...
Moves made in the past were in the past.. and as shytty and heart breaking as they were, i don't believe its useful to compare and contrast the myriad of fvck ups the Knicks have done in the past decade... because a fvck up is a fvck up is a fvck up... but a lot of you guys are giving him a pass, when at the same time thomas and layden were shiitted on.. i'm an equal opportunity hater ... bring back dave checketts and ernie grundfelld
I hear 'ya. A lot of suffering for us Knicks fans and we want to blame someone. But the one constant since the 90s is JAMES DOLAN. He's the one who deserves our ire.
We almost had that Russian owner bying us. We were his first choice. If we don't get Lebron, massive boycott from Cablevision folks. Get ATT or DIRECT TV... Anything. Let's tank the ownership and force them to sell.
I wasn't onboard with the Walsh signing. Wanted Bryan Colangelo. I didn't want D'antoni. Wanted Mark Jackson. Got both anyway.
But, I have to admit, the last 2 years were not entirely their fault. Sure, we could have went with Lee, Starbury, Randoph & Crawford. Hoped Curry stayed healthy. Maybe make the 2nd round. But that team wouldn't have inspired much hope, and we would be seating here now worse off for the next 4 years.
At least we can improve this team now. SURE, STAT is stupid move now if we don't get Lebron.... BUT, it's better than what we had.
OF COURSE, I would prefer Lee to STAT, but we can use LEE to get talent in a S-&-T.
With no Lebron, we have to deal Lee.
STAT and a deal with GSW (possibly for Randolph and others) is better than signing Lee + Boozer (or something). We'll see.
I hate to defend Walsh, but he did do most things right. Even if losing for 2 years was foolish.