Like I was telling a friend (and I think I posted on here too), this team, even when they were playing well, are not chip contenders. Neither are the Nuggets, so I don't wanna hear about what could have been with a roster full of "pretty nice" players.
Or just settle for a really good regular season team, that's always drafting 20-27, but no rings.
If we sustained and played the way we began, I think we could have been considered legit contenders. And I too had a problem with winning by the 3 (duh).
I see things (the mistakes) in a more long-term and short-term way. If we were going to build on a formula then lets agree the formula has a Superstar usually a legit scorer; low post defense and rebounds (bigs), three point shooter(s), and someone to control the flow (PG) (depth too). Your analysis (that I enjoyed) neglected to mention the Mavs where I think the argument could be made that we were modeled after currently (in theory). But to digress...
The long-term mistakes took place years ago:
Hiring D'antoni who didn't and doesn't appreciate bigs (a necessary ingredient to go from good to great).
This lead to a slew of mismanaged and misevaluated players that we had and yet to come. I say this because who knows what would have happened since. We can start with Marbury who was benched because he got into an shouting match in a preseason game vs Boston. He was hype, came back looking strong, the rest is history.
Then there's Jordan Hill. I heard Hahn mention this list of could've had(s): Jennings, Holiday, DeRozen, Lawson, Teague, Collison, Gibson, etc... and it saddens me as the formula includes a PG who is solid. Yet we let D'Antoni convince us that Nash was the only one who would suffice despite both never winning a chip.smh :thumbsup:
I have to agree with signing STAT but I can argue that using the amnesty on Billups to get Tyson was also partly a mistake. The mistake there was STAT already hurt his back (I'm leery of knees and backs) and the opportunity arose and the coach we had (which later turns out to be a blessing) didn't know how to use him. Again pointing to big bodies but this time it's about use.
Chandler's use became obvious when coach D'Antoni had no choice but to play Lin. Lin knew no other way than to play conventional regardless of D'Antoni SSOL (LOSS) system; drive and dish. This lead to us going inside and basically featuring Chandler on offense with Melo out. It also indicated that we still had team players willing to pass the rock just like pre Melo. This begins our short term errors.
You take off the D'ANtoni lens and the player valuation (evaluation) changes. Woodson being conditioned under D'Antoni, obviously valued Melo, but like his predecessor devalued Lin and Chandler (offensively). I agree Lin needed defensive help but we saw how Shump made up for that. I say the error here is not managing Lin properly to maximize his worth.
Then just as in the past, coach is forced to make adjustments due to injury. But recall STAT was a starter so any change should have been temporary. He bumps knees and has an MRI on one knee and not the other. Mistake.
Then like in the past coach falls in love with small ball; Melo at the 4; three's galore. He too goes against conventional wisdom and negates and neglects using our big(s) in the post and devalues defense. Now Brewer who was slumping (even though he gave us more than expected... off an injury) is first sat in favor of less than desirable replacements then traded. This was after it was obvious we could overcome our three point bonanzas and little to no rebounding with our team defense. Which is mind numbing because the FO and coach basically systematically reduced our power with their self defeating decisions.
Lets do the math. IF everyone pre Brewer trade were healthy, and I said name the best most reliable defenders on the Knicks who would you name? TC, Shump, Wallace, Brewer, and to a degree Kidd. Well IF we stick to the formula, and had we learned our lesson going 18-5, we would see that IF we surround Melo with some defense and shooters off the bench we could compete. So who did we have healthy? TC/one + Brewer/two. Thats it... we had two reliable defenders and one Shump coming back. If the plan was to replace Brewer, even with Brewer off-the bench we would have maintained defense at the two.
The MAVS formula had a reliable defender at the 2. Hello? And one was already hurt.. hello? Is there any wonder what happened to the defense.
After that the problems for 2 months now have been cyclical IMO. Melo gets hurt is no surprise. JR shooting us in and out of games. Have you heard any announcers say that JR and the Knicks are undisciplined and need to drive the ball more? Why hasn't coach dictated this? He was checking dudes now he looks dumbfounded. It should be Play his way or else... or is this his way? Shouldn't a good coach realize when something has developed and cultivated it, especially if it was working? Wouldn't you adjust your formula and try to adhere to the same principles that got you this far?
I see how we squandered many opportunities to not be "a top four team" but to over achieve and compete on a consistent basis. I see a coach who has made bad worse by not planning. Fail to plan, plan to fail.
A competitive team, not a 63 point, undisciplined, devoid of leadership team. That's the most we could ask for. Make the best decisions given the options to put us in a position to win, like acquiring Martin as soon as a Camby and Wallace go out with overuse injuries; don't wait. I have documented that coach is losing this team.
Whoever is a leader, including coach, needs to step up now.