Let's be real though, this is just summer league. Plenty of players play well in summer league only to suck it up during the regular season. At best, what this shows us is that Porzingis has some decent raw tools and potential. That's about it.
That being said, I'm going to make a bold prediction. Porzingis is a student of the game with good intangibles, a strong work ethic, and good natural tools. I think he's going to be a solid rotation player like 2016-17 and a starter by 2017-18. Yeah, he's raw and skinny, but so were Giannis Antetokounmpo and Rudy Gobert. Those guys each needed a year as bench players to work on their games and adjust to the NBA before they became solid starters (who will continue to improve), and I think the same is going to be true for Porzingis. He's going to spend most of his first year getting a few minutes here or there but spending most of his time working out in the weight room and adding size. Next year is going to be when he makes his impact.
Exactly. Well said...
I think Phil did everything he could to convince himself NOT to draft Porzingis. Sure, who wouldn’t want a 19-yr-old kid with his measurables (7”3’ w/ shoes; 7”6’ wingspan; 38-inch vertical leap), with 3 years of pro ball experience, who possesses a SG’s shooting stroke!
But, the kid is skinny for a cartoon character, he’s from Europe, he’s not ideal to mesh with ‘Melo in the short-term plan, and the backlash will be tremendous (after a year of failure and miscues after failure and miscues).
Still, when you see it… you see it. And, if you’re Phil and you saw it firsthand yourself, then how do you convince yourself that it wasn’t all that impressive?
I mean, when you add the intangibles with the measurables… when you consider the skill set, and raw talent, and the inherent attributes you simply cannot “teach” then you have what PJ arrived at:
A once-in-a-decade prospect: a raw kid with tremendous size, and length, and freakish athleticism; a natural ability that’s rivaled and matched with a personality, intelligence, grit and toughness, to go with an incredibly efficiency and a humble demeanor and mature composure, and a high bball IQ... He really is the complete package, and his mind/attitude displays a wisdom well beyond his age.
I mean, what’s left not to like? (1) The EURO prejudice. This is justified, but only a fool would allow a general stereotype to cloud your judgment about the individual. (2) His weight. Other than being an obstacle in the short-term, putting on muscle is as easy as anything else with proper diet/training.
Sure, Mudiay, Johnson, Winslow, WCS, Kaminsky, Lyles, Herzonjia… all solid prospects in their own right… And, yes, Porz has to stay healthy (which may not be an easy feat), and his body has to handle the 82 game season… And, yes, if you take the field, and keep saying this prospect, or that prospect is good now, or can be better… I’m sure the odds are in your favor that if we look back in 7 years… somebody picked after PORZ may be the better NBA player.
However, given his size and talent, and already seeing how he’s handled himself (booing, SL, interviews)… I totally get why scouts went ga-ga… and why we took him. Personally, it would have been tough for me to take PORZ over Mudiay… but Mudiay not a great fit for PJ’s triangle. And PJ is drafting for his style, so saying why draft a guy for a system we won’t play in 3 years (even if valid, is a fool’s errand).
Anyway, there’s always risk. But, like some have said, NYK couldn’t just draft a good player (Mudiay, Kaminsky, WCS)… they needed to really hit one out of the park here. They deemed PORZ to be that prospect. For those who are adamant that we went with the wrong guy… go on record now, and tell me who was the better option. Then, in 5 years, we shall see…