knicksin60
Starter
After I saw the aggressive and ruthless behavior of some of these posters I thought that I was living in Compton all over again.
metro
Whats ur beef with Wilson? True his ball handling is not good but in a system where the PG is so important, dribbling is not even necessary. Wilson inside the 3 point arc jumpshot is also pretty good, not bad at all. Wilson has been getting better and with the way he is going, i can see em turning to a great role player.
How does Lee have trade value?
metro
Whats ur beef with Wilson? True his ball handling is not good but in a system where the PG is so important, dribbling is not even necessary. Wilson inside the 3 point arc jumpshot is also pretty good, not bad at all. Wilson has been getting better and with the way he is going, i can see em turning to a great role player.
Metro look bro....there is no team that is trading for Curry and Jefferies this season
I'm tired of hearing this.
We've seen far worst trades made in the NBA.
NBA GM's aren't geniuses so lets put a stop to that.
Anything can happen in the NBA.
Any trade, anything.
This is as realistic.
1. please tell me one deal worst than this
2. True GM's arent "geniuses", but there has to be logic to their moves. Even in "bad trades" GMs can offer up a somewhat crediable explanation for the move, please provide any sort of explanation for why any team would want either of them, while giving up a young player who has been solid for them?
Lastly, by you stating "anything can happen" you are pretty much admitting that this is not a realistic move! That statement says it all there champ
Look recently I proposed some long shot deals, like Jared Jefferies and Douglas for Ridnour or Lee and Cuttino for Amare, those are "stranger things have happened" sort of trades. But those are justifiable moves for both teams, again just not likely to happen.
Any team taking on nearly 18 million dollars in salary next year -11 of which is from a player who has not played more than 15 games in the past two seasons combined- is the very example of unrealistic!
so again I challenge you to provide any real incentive for Chicago -a team looking to sign a MaX FA this summer- to take either of these deals on
Don't worry I'll wait.
metro
Whats ur beef with Wilson? True his ball handling is not good but in a system where the PG is so important, dribbling is not even necessary. Wilson inside the 3 point arc jumpshot is also pretty good, not bad at all. Wilson has been getting better and with the way he is going, i can see em turning to a great role player.
Thats your opinion.
Chicago needs to build around Derrick Rose, and David Lee is a perfect big man for Rose.
Chicago doesnt need to sign a max FA because they their franchise player in Rose. Their need for cap space isn't as serious as New York, therefor they can carry on Jefferies and Curry to have the luxury of Lee. Plus, Jefferies is a very serviceable defensive specialist.
Anything can happen.
Isiah Thomas is a prime example...and he's not the one horrible GM in the NBA.
This move benefits Chicago, and if you can't see the logic in that, you failed as a basketball analysis. Entirely.
He became an all star.
Too bad our PG sucks.
I don't want Chandler as a primary guy in the paint, he only averages 15 ppg...not efficient enough for me.
OK.....so if Chicago wanted to use Lee as a piece to add to Rose why wouldnt they just wait until the Summer to sign him without having to take on Jefferies and Curry's contracts?
Plus, just because a team already has a franchise player doesnt mean that they are not going to try to be conservative with cap space! Miami is a prime example of this, having cap to spend plus a franchise player is the situation that every GM of a rebuilding team would like to be in. I mean wouldnt Chicago want a player like D Wade, Bosh or Joe Johnson instead of having Jefferies and Curry? Come on now!
Plus you still havent explained why they would even consider giving up Noah in this deal.
This deal top to bottom does not make sense and would never even be discussed. Again if your logic on getting this trade done is simply that there are bad GM's out there, then that really says it all.
That's like going on a job interview and telling the interviewer you could get the job simply because companies make bad choices in who they hire all the time!
I'm pretty sure I am not the one who failed here chief!
Boy, you need to learn how to read.
I gave you my reason this benefits Chicago.
You're just repeating yourself and looking stupid now.
Jefferies and Curry aren't 5 year deals, they expire in 2011.
So can you please shut the hell up and stop wasting my time here?
You're talking about nothing.
Plus, Jefferies is a very serviceable defensive specialist. .
Thank god none of those trades metro listed will happen. and thank god kiya isn't a front office guy
Haha, Metro your hilarious. I don't make quality posts, ok..., atleast I don't come up with stupid s*** trades which will never happen.
So the Bulls will get rid of their C who is playing the best ball in his career for Curry who has played a total of 10 games the last two seasons. Yeah the Bulls are going to take Jefferies and Curry, when they stated they want to be players in the 2010 free agency. So they're going to give us a expiring in James and pick up not 1 but 2 contracts going into 2011? I don't think so.
Your the dumba** that comes up with retarded a** posts like this. At least I think logically, realistically and not like a idiot who comes up with the most absurd trade scenarios and posts. Good Job douche.
I just read most the time but, he soooo right METRO YOU RETARDED SERIOUS you need to stop with them wack azzzz trades the only one i would consider is the one with CURRY AND JEFFRIES Leaving together and that one right there shows how retarded you are thinking anyone will take BOTH TOGETHER yeah ok we will set up the BLOW JOBS for that one So I hope you suck a good one Bi@tch.
LOL,I think you are getting frustrated because you realize that your deal makes no sense and you can not support it!
you said that you did provide logic to this move but I dont see it , so explain to me again why Chicago would take on Curry and Jefferies just to get David Lee and Nate, when they could get them both this summer without taking on Curry and Jefferies contracts.
I also asked you to explain why they would give up Noah in such a deal....you didnt explain that.
Look the whole reason as to why we are trying to dump Curry and Jefferies is to be FA players this July, so even though they are not "five year contracts" it would take them out of the market for FAs next year and you can say that having Lee and Nate would be worth that to them?
I am going to leave you alone because I simply feel like a bully now picking on you for your lack of insight. If you can really still try to support this trade you are either extremely stubborn or just plain......well we'll just leave it at that!
Allow me to help you out....how about remaining this thread "Moves I wish The Knicks could make, but have no chance in hell of happening" that would at least not make you look so oblivious.
Don't worry I think most posters on this site read this trade proposal and never opened this thread again -In retrospect is what I shouldve done too- so me expsosing your lack of knowledge on basketball went vitually unnoticed:thumbsup:
What the hell are you saying?
Is this English?
You repeated yourself over and over...
My deals made a lot of sense.
I provided logic and I still stand corrected.
David Lee is an all star PF who can provide offense and as much rebounding as Noah.
Thomas is just an extra piece, Chicago has no interest in him.
Curry and Jefferies expire in 2011
It isn't a NECESSITY for Chicago to land a big a FA in 2010, they will be free agents in 2010.
Get that in your head boy...you're totally failing yourself.
Chicago get Lee and Nate now to play more games and get familar with the new system, to prep them for the 2010-2011 season, obviously much better chemistry than these guys going into training camp with no experience.
Obviously, I can't take you seriously because you've came at me like a fool.
I'm the greatest poster on this site and I'm the only dude here who can say that who will have people back me up on that, I don't even have to try...its just a given, where I can say whatever I want, my credibility will always be standing.
Someone like you tries too hard for credibility, so when the opportunity arises, you prematurely cum too fast.
Kid, I arrive home from work and an intense workout laughing at how hard you're trying to "embarass me". Theres no such thing.
I really don't feel like trying...you don't interest me. I get nothing out of shitting on you...this honestly a waste of time for me. You were a nobody here and will always be a nobdoy, you're just someone who post a lot and talks a lot of shit...keep repeating yourself and making no sense.
One on one, no one has challenged me in debates.
I haven't tried in over a year.
Only dude I would go hard against is homer, getreal or kiya or someone to their caliber(you know who you are)
When you try too hard, it doesnt look good...doesnt look patten or authentic...you know? This isn't you. Your a back up, 3rd string type of guy.
Rep points in real life do nothing for you...relax holmes. You still did not address how Lee is a trade asset as an unrestricted free agent in only a few months.
**** Rep points. I'm the best wherever I go.
in real life, you have breast. Real life isn't a topic you should speak about.
I addressed everything, learn how to read.
I'm the best wherever I go
What the hell are you saying?
Is this English?
You repeated yourself over and over...
My deals made a lot of sense.
I provided logic and I still stand corrected.
David Lee is an all star PF who can provide offense and as much rebounding as Noah.
Thomas is just an extra piece, Chicago has no interest in him.
Curry and Jefferies expire in 2011
It isn't a NECESSITY for Chicago to land a big a FA in 2010, they will be free agents in 2010.
Get that in your head boy...you're totally failing yourself.
Chicago get Lee and Nate now to play more games and get familar with the new system, to prep them for the 2010-2011 season, obviously much better chemistry than these guys going into training camp with no experience.
Obviously, I can't take you seriously because you've came at me like a fool.
I'm the greatest poster on this site and I'm the only dude here who can say that who will have people back me up on that, I don't even have to try...its just a given, where I can say whatever I want, my credibility will always be standing.
Someone like you tries too hard for credibility, so when the opportunity arises, you prematurely cum too fast.
Kid, I arrive home from work and an intense workout laughing at how hard you're trying to "embarass me". Theres no such thing.
I really don't feel like trying...you don't interest me. I get nothing out of shitting on you...this honestly a waste of time for me. You were a nobody here and will always be a nobdoy, you're just someone who post a lot and talks a lot of shit...keep repeating yourself and making no sense.
One on one, no one has challenged me in debates.
I haven't tried in over a year.
Only dude I would go hard against is homer, getreal or kiya or someone to their caliber(you know who you are)
When you try too hard, it doesnt look good...doesnt look patten or authentic...you know? This isn't you. Your a back up, 3rd string type of guy.
Rep points in real life do nothing for you...relax holmes. You still did not address how Lee is a trade asset as an unrestricted free agent in only a few months.