Hill requests trade... lol.... why sign in Sac?
Stephen A Smith said Knicks could’ve had Eric Bledsoe.... PHO wanted Knitikilina but NYK wouldn’t trade the rookie. Untouchable.
A lot of people like Ntilikina. Untouchable I think not, I don't see it based on the year he's having and from what I see on the floor. Only thing I'll give him is he's 19 and he'll get better but you could say that about every 19 yr old rookie.Hill requests trade... lol.... why sign in Sac?
Stephen A Smith said Knicks could’ve had Eric Bledsoe.... PHO wanted Knitikilina but NYK wouldn’t trade the rookie. Untouchable.
Quinn has no problem scoring or rebounding when opponents play him physically.
If we?re going in the tank, and we pretty much are, the 2 guys to move before the deadline are Lee and Lance Thomas. Those two are on the books for about 20 million each of the next 2 seasons. I don?t expect much return on them, but if we can get expiring contracts in return, that is good enough.
O?Quinn and Kanter both have player options for next year. Neither is going to generate a big return. I want to keep Kanter and then hire a coach who will actually play Kanter in the 4th quarter. If we can get a late 1st round pick for O?Quinn that would be a huge win. Otherwise, I?d take a 2nd round pick and live with it.
Hornacek screwed us with WHG. Before the season, WHG easily would have gotten us a 1st round pick. Now, I think we have to wait and play WHG while in the tank late in the season. Other teams will want WHG by the deadline, but I bet that?s at a 2nd round pick price and screw that.
Hill requests trade... lol.... why sign in Sac?
Stephen A Smith said Knicks could?ve had Eric Bledsoe.... PHO wanted Knitikilina but NYK wouldn?t trade the rookie. Untouchable.
Read some drivel about why the Knicks drafted Ntilikina from Hornacek. Said they knew some guys were more NBA ready but they were looking at what Nits would be in 5 years. Absolute BS if that was the reason, when have the Knicks had the patience to wait 5 years for a rookie to develop, the decision is going to come in his 2 option years. Didn't know that there are those that think he was the wrong choice because everyone I hear talk about him says he's some kind of defensive wunderkind.
Markkanen the guy picked before him is a stud and proving he's NBA ready already starting for the Bulls. DSJ starting and may be a franchise player for the Mavs. We pick a kid that says he can play better but its going to take time, if not this year maybe next year. Knicks were dumb using a lottery pick on him, more a late first or second round selection to me like Frank Mason who has size questions and his ability to compete in the NBA. I think Shump showed more defensive potential than Nits and we picked him at 17.I still don’t want DSJ instead of Ntilikina, for reasons we’ve already beaten to death, but no question that at this stage Donovan Mitchell would have been the better choice.
Markkanen the guy picked before him is a stud and proving he's NBA ready already starting for the Bulls. DSJ starting and may be a franchise player for the Mavs. We pick a kid that says he can play better but its going to take time, if not this year maybe next year. Knicks were dumb using a lottery pick on him, more a late first or second round selection to me like Frank Mason who has size questions and his ability to compete in the NBA. I think Shump showed more defensive potential than Nits and we picked him at 17.
Markkanen the guy picked before him is a stud and proving he's NBA ready already starting for the Bulls. DSJ starting and may be a franchise player for the Mavs. We pick a kid that says he can play better but its going to take time, if not this year maybe next year. Knicks were dumb using a lottery pick on him, more a late first or second round selection to me like Frank Mason who has size questions and his ability to compete in the NBA. I think Shump showed more defensive potential than Nits and we picked him at 17.
Part of D is being physical and athletic to block shots and beat guys to spots, he doesn't have the strength nor athleticism to do that, how many chase down blocks has or intercepted a pass with his quickness. He also plays against the other teams second units which likely gives him a higher D rating than if he played against the Walls or Kyries. And I agree with that Warrior broadcaster I heard yesterday that said playing good D is not enough you have to put the ball in the basket in talking about Nits.Also, and I know I'm stacking posts here in a thread that is supposed to be about trades, but the advanced defensive stats back-up that Ntilikina is already an impact defensive player.
According to NBA.com, Ntilikina has the best defensive rating (points allowed per 100 possessions) on the team with a 102.9 rating. He is followed by Kyle O'Quinn (104.6), McDermott (105.1), and Porzingis (105.7).
And yes, you guessed it, Ntilikina also has the worst offensive rating on the team, so, you know, room to grow...
Part of D is being physical and athletic to block shots and beat guys to spots, he doesn't have the strength nor athleticism to do that, how many chase down blocks has or intercepted a pass with his quickness. He also plays against the other teams second units which likely gives him a higher D rating than if he played against the Walls or Kyries. And I agree with that Warrior broadcaster I heard yesterday that said playing good D is not enough you have to put the ball in the basket in talking about Nits.
I also think there is an element of picking and choosing when to put focus on these other rookies to make a case for them being good or bad. DSJ shot 3 for 11 tonight and had 4 turnovers in their loss to Houston. He now has 17 turnovers over his last 5 games. Makes it sound like he is struggling, whereas if we instead talked about his points per game it makes it sound like he is doing well.
Similarly, Markkanen had a huge game last time out with 17 boards, but he is still only averaging less than 8 boards per game despite how he has been getting about 30 minutes per game all season. He's also 2 for his last 15 from 3 point range.
Not counting Simmons, only guys from the 2017 NBA draft who in my mind have been consistently good are Tatum, Mitchell, and Kuzma.
Part of D is being physical and athletic to block shots and beat guys to spots, he doesn't have the strength nor athleticism to do that, how many chase down blocks has or intercepted a pass with his quickness. He also plays against the other teams second units which likely gives him a higher D rating than if he played against the Walls or Kyries. And I agree with that Warrior broadcaster I heard yesterday that said playing good D is not enough you have to put the ball in the basket in talking about Nits.
This is interesting on the subject of "picking and choosing" citing DSJ 3-11fg and 4TOs but then lauding Mitchell although on the same night he shot for 6-21fg while also having 4TOs. Mitchell has been the more consistent rookie pretty convincingly. I think all are in agreement Mitchell deserved to be picked as much as anyone left on the board at 8 but I'll say it again...take all these rookies best gms stack them against each other and Knits still rates low. Also don't let it be lost DSJ is having his best month in ast/stls when coupling in comparison to his previous mos...which suggest he's improving as a point guard offensively/defensively. OTOH this is Knits worse month offensively and more importantly defensively which is what you were hanging your hat on with him.
Heck a kid who often times never gets mentioned anymore on this board Josh Jackson who plays off the bench like Knits...go look at his "game logs" his production best Knits by a wide margin. Like as far as the sunrise is to the sunset.
Iman Shumpert while kudos to him for having a so-called "nice career"(IMO he's pretty underwhelming Cleveland wanted to dump him as soon as they gave him his deal) he wasn't a lottery pick, meanwhile Knits is...thus that's not gonna fly having a "nice career".
Knits needs to be pretty dam good because of our circumstances and quite FRANKLY the league is getting younger and catching up quickly. I'd wager to say Trae Young from Oklahoma is better than our guy right now with the mistmatch on physical metrics and all.
In one post, you guys preach the tank. In the next post, you say that 2nd youngest player in the NBA Frank Ntilikina needs to get good quick. To do what? Lead us to a championship?
On the subject of Shump, that knee injury derailed everything. He was becoming a game changer on defense when it happened. He was never the same after it. The kid stuck it out and is now 7 years into a career and has a ring. So, yeah, nice career. Your boy Mudiay from 2 years ago going to have as nice a career?![]()
Mudiay is what many would consider a bust but I feel Malone did him no favors. He even admitted as much last yr. A coach who has now vaulted Jamal Murray ahead of Jokic(who is considerably their best player) and often times a quintessential 6th man in Barton above Jokic, Malone is an oddity and runs a scoring guard centric system. For now you can have that, I've conceded this already in previous posts a while back and have no problem being wrong because with all the analysis on players on this forum no way one can get them all right.
OTOH your arguments have been inconsistent concerning certain players and usually lands on the side of homerism.
Yeah Knits needs to get better quickly. He can be close to Donovan Mitchell good, while we end up in the lottery(Utah most likely is and you'd take him now correct?). Once again an All-Star in #kporzee has led us there twice already so now what? The key is when we land there again we don't want to revisit whether we should be selecting a point guard "a 15yr near outstanding issue" because fans such as yourself "could see him sliding over to the two"....Naaah we drafted him to play POINT GUARD.
Get Better Quickly young fella it's pretty simple. What I do love about Knits and this isn't talked about enough is how high quality of a guy we have. I don't anticipate any foolishness with him, seems wise beyond his yrs.